The "Devil's Advocate" Strategy
Use this to stress-test your business plans or strategic decisions before finalizing them.
Act as a senior strategic consultant known for rigorous risk assessment. I am going to present a business decision to [Insert Context]. Your goal is to critique this plan, identifying 3 potential failure points and 2 overlooked market risks. Be direct and constructive.
Explain Code to a Junior Dev
Great for documentation or understanding legacy codebases quickly.
Explain the following code snippet as if you are a senior engineer teaching a junior developer. Focus on the logic flow, potential edge cases, and why specific functions were used. Finally, suggest one optimization for readability. Code: [Insert Code]
Meeting Minutes to Action Plan
Turn messy notes into a structured table of deliverables.
I am pasting rough notes from a meeting below. Please restructure this into a clean Markdown table with columns: 'Agenda Item', 'Decision Made', 'Action Item', 'Owner', and 'Deadline'. If a deadline wasn't mentioned, mark it TBD. Notes: [Insert Notes]
Tone & Style Shifter
Rewrite content for specific audiences without losing the core message.
Rewrite the following text to be more persuasive and executive-friendly. Remove jargon, focus on ROI, and keep the tone confident but professional. Aim for a Flesch-Kincaid grade level of 8. Text: [Insert Text]
Gap Analysis
Identify what is missing between your current state and desired future state.
Perform a Gap Analysis for [Company/Project].
Current State: [Insert State]
Desired Future State: [Insert Goal]
Identify the operational, technological, and skills gaps that bridge these two states. Present as a bulleted list prioritized by impact.
The 80/20 Summarizer
Get the 20% of information that gives you 80% of the value from long docs.
Summarize the attached document using the Pareto Principle (80/20 rule). Identify the 20% of the insights that provide 80% of the value. Format the output as 'Key Insight' followed by 'Actionable Takeaway'. Document: [Insert Text]
Where My Emails Work Against Me
Look for recurring habits that may create confusion, weaken trust, or make it harder for others to act.
Review the email samples I provide as a thoughtful executive communication coach. Identify recurring patterns that may make my communication less effective or unintentionally work against my success. Look for unclear requests, buried decisions, missing context, avoidant or overly forceful language, unnecessary length, weak ownership, and places where the reader may not know what to do next. For every pattern, cite a brief example from my writing, explain the likely effect on the reader, and suggest a more effective alternative. Also identify strengths I should preserve. End with three reflection questions and one communication habit to practice this week. Do not infer personality or intent beyond the evidence in the messages. Emails: [Paste a representative, de-identified sample]
Does My Future Calendar Match What Matters?
Compare the time already committed in the weeks ahead with the priorities you say matter most.
Review my upcoming calendar for the next [two/four/six] weeks alongside the priorities I list below. Group scheduled time by priority, obligation, relationship, operational work, learning, and recovery or focus time. Estimate how much time each group receives and identify where my calendar supports or contradicts my stated priorities. Flag fragmented days, meetings without a clear purpose, important work with no protected time, and commitments that could be shortened, delegated, combined, or declined. Then propose a realistic rebalance using the time already available. Ask me five questions before recommending changes where the purpose of an event is unclear. Priorities: [List what matters most]. Calendar: [Paste a de-identified future calendar export]
What My Last 30 Days Say I Prioritize
Let your actual attention reveal the work you have prioritized—then compare it with what you expected to see.
Based only on the last 30 days of de-identified emails and calendar invitations I provide, identify the most important things I appear to be working on. Use evidence such as repeated topics, time committed, people involved, decisions requested, deadlines, and follow-up activity. Produce a short list of apparent priorities, explain the evidence for each, and note what received attention but little progress. Do not assume that frequency automatically equals importance; distinguish urgent activity from meaningful work. Before showing your analysis, ask me to write down what I expect the top priorities will be. Then present a side-by-side comparison: what I expected, what the evidence suggests, where they align, where they differ, and one question each difference raises for me. Emails and invitations: [Paste or attach de-identified content]
Need Custom Prompts for Your Team?
We build internal prompt libraries tailored to your company's specific workflows, security protocols, and tech stack.
Get Custom Training